- Apple a10 fusion vs snapdragon 665
- Specifications:
- Performances :
- Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
- Почему Apple A10X Fusion лучше чем Qualcomm Snapdragon 665?
- Почему Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 лучше чем Apple A10X Fusion?
- Какие сравнения самые популярные?
- Отзывы пользователей
- Общий рейтинг
- Функции
- Комментарии
- Общая информация
- Производительность
- Apple A10 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
- Почему Apple A10 лучше чем Qualcomm Snapdragon 665?
- Почему Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 лучше чем Apple A10?
- Какие сравнения самые популярные?
- Отзывы пользователей
- Общий рейтинг
- Функции
- Комментарии
- Общая информация
- Производительность
- Apple A10 Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
- Почему Apple A10 Fusion лучше чем Qualcomm Snapdragon 665?
- Почему Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 лучше чем Apple A10 Fusion?
- Какие сравнения самые популярные?
- Отзывы пользователей
- Общий рейтинг
- Функции
- Комментарии
- Общая информация
- Производительность
- Apple a10 fusion vs snapdragon 665
- Performances:
- Equivalence:
- Smartphones with the processor Apple A10 Fusion:
Apple a10 fusion vs snapdragon 665
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A10 Fusion on one side and the Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.3GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Specifications:
Processor | Apple A10 Fusion | Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 |
Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone |
ISA | ARMv8.1-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) |
Microarchitecture | Hurricane, Zephyr | Cortex-A73, Cortex-A53 |
Core name | Hurricane, Zephyr | Kryo 260 Gold, Kryo 260 Silver |
Family | A series | Snapdragon 600 |
Part number(s), S-Spec | APL1W24 | SM6125 |
Release date | Q3 2016 | Q2 2019 |
Lithography | 16 nm FinFET | 11 nm LPP |
Transistors | 3,300,000,000 | — |
Cores | 4 | 8 |
Threads | 4 | 8 |
Base frequency | 1.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Turbo frequency | 2.3 GHz | 2.0 GHz |
Energy cores | 2x Apple Zephyr @ 1.3 GHz | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Silver @ 1.8 GHz |
High performance cores | 2x Apple Hurricane @ 2.34 GHz | 4x Qualcomm Kryo 260 Gold @ 2.0 GHz |
Cache memory | 4 MB | 1 MB |
Max memory capacity | 3 GB | 8 GB |
Memory types | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3/LPDDR4X-1866 |
Max # of memory channels | 4 | 2 |
Max memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 14.93 GB/s |
TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR GT7600 Plus | Qualcomm Adreno 610 |
GPU execution units | 6 | 2 |
GPU shading units | 192 | 96 |
GPU boost clock | 900 MHz | 600 MHz |
GPU FP32 floating point | 364.8 GFLOPS | 115.2 GFLOPS |
Socket | SoC | SoC |
AnTuTu | 179,650 | 142,880 |
(iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 3,358 | 1,507 |
(iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,692 | 5,494 |
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 88.2 GFLOPS | 36.1 GFLOPS |
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 1,138 pts / W | 1,099 pts / W |
Amazon | ||
eBay |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Apple A10 Fusion is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
AnTuTu — Total score | |
---|---|
Apple A10 Fusion | 179,650 |
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | 142,880 |
The difference is 26%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS & Android 64-bit | |
---|---|
Apple A10 Fusion | 3,358 5,692 |
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | 1,507 5,494 |
In single core, the difference is 123%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 4%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Источник
Apple A10X Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Почему Apple A10X Fusion лучше чем Qualcomm Snapdragon 665?
- Размер полупроводников 1nm меньше
Почему Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 лучше чем Apple A10X Fusion?
- 45.18% выше скорость центрального процессора
Какие сравнения самые популярные?
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
Mediatek Helio G95
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
Mediatek Helio G95
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
MediaTek Helio G80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
MediaTek Dimensity 700
Mediatek Helio G95
MediaTek Dimensity 1200
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
MediaTek Dimensity 920
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G 5G
MediaTek Helio G35
MediaTek Helio P35
Отзывы пользователей
Общий рейтинг
Функции
Комментарии
Отзывов пока нет
Помогите нашему сообществу, поделившись своим опытом.
Общая информация
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Производительность
3 x 2.39GHz & 3 x 1.1GHz
4 x 2GHz & 4 x 1.8GHz
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10X Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Источник
Apple A10 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Почему Apple A10 лучше чем Qualcomm Snapdragon 665?
- Частота графического процессора 250MHz больше
Почему Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 лучше чем Apple A10?
- 2.21x выше скорость центрального процессора
Какие сравнения самые популярные?
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G85
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G80
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Samsung Exynos 850
Apple A10X Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio P35
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G35
Apple A11 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G70
Apple A12X Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Apple A10 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Mediatek Helio G95
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G90T
Отзывы пользователей
Общий рейтинг
Функции
Комментарии
Отзывов пока нет
Помогите нашему сообществу, поделившись своим опытом.
Общая информация
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10)
Производительность
2 x 2.34GHz & 2 x 1.1GHz
4 x 2GHz & 4 x 1.8GHz
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Источник
Apple A10 Fusion vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Почему Apple A10 Fusion лучше чем Qualcomm Snapdragon 665?
Почему Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 лучше чем Apple A10 Fusion?
- 2.24x выше скорость центрального процессора
Какие сравнения самые популярные?
Apple A10 Fusion
Apple A11 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G85
Apple A10 Fusion
Apple A10X Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G80
Apple A10 Fusion
Apple A13 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Samsung Exynos 850
Apple A10 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Apple A10 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio P35
Apple A10 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G35
Apple A10 Fusion
Apple A12 Bionic
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G70
Apple A10 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
HiSilicon Kirin 710
Apple A10 Fusion
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
Mediatek Helio G95
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
MediaTek Helio G90T
Отзывы пользователей
Общий рейтинг
Функции
Комментарии
Отзывов пока нет
Помогите нашему сообществу, поделившись своим опытом.
Общая информация
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10 Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10 Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10 Fusion)
Производительность
2 x 2.34GHz & 2 x 1.05GHz
4 x 2GHz & 4 x 1.8GHz
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10 Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10 Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10 Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10 Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A10 Fusion)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 665)
Источник
Apple a10 fusion vs snapdragon 665
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
This comparative table allows us to better appreciate the differences between the various processors. The performance for Geekbench 4 single-core and multi-core are established by default on the Windows operating system, on Linux if there is at least one server processor present in the comparison, on Mac OS X if we make a parallel with at least one Apple branded processor on Linux and Android if a smartphone processor other than Apple is present. Each time, in 64-bit version.
Performances:
AnTuTu — Total score | |
---|---|
Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | 822,852 |
Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | 702,560 |
Qualcomm SM8250-AB Snapdragon 865+ 5G | 591,050 |
Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | 558,510 |
Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | 530,647 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 775G | 530,000 |
Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G 5G | 525,653 |
Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G | 522,861 |
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ | 480,000 |
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 860 | 479,037 |
Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | 359,350 |
Qualcomm SM7250-AC Snapdragon 768G | 353,540 |
Qualcomm SM7250-AB Snapdragon 765G 5G | 330,590 |
Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | 329,020 |
Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 | 283,936 |
Apple A10 Fusion | 179,650 |
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
PassMark — CPU Mark & single thread | |
---|---|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx | 1,748 3,676 |
iOS PassMark — CPU Mark | |
---|---|
Apple A10 Fusion | 2,526 |
Android PassMark — CPU Mark | |
---|---|
Qualcomm SM8250-AB Snapdragon 865+ 5G | 6,132 |
Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | 4,685 |
Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | 4,280 |
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ | 3,979 |
Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | 3,451 |
Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | 3,014 |
Qualcomm SM7150-AB Snapdragon 730G | 2,947 |
Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | 2,864 |
Qualcomm SM7150-AA Snapdragon 730 | 2,856 |
Qualcomm SDM712 Snapdragon 712 | 2,602 |
Qualcomm SM6150 Snapdragon 675 | 2,590 |
Qualcomm SDM660 Snapdragon 660 | 2,549 |
Qualcomm SDM670 Snapdragon 670 | 2,433 |
Qualcomm SM6125 Snapdragon 665 | 2,355 |
Qualcomm SDM710 Snapdragon 710 | 2,218 |
PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.
Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score | |
---|---|
Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | 5,022 13,915 |
Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | 4,670 13,281 |
Qualcomm SM8250-AB Snapdragon 865+ 5G | 4,369 12,857 |
Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | 3,927 12,548 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G | 3,640 12,053 |
Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 | 3,545 11,150 |
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 860 | 3,238 11,073 |
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 855+ | 3,730 11,018 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx | 3,021 9,949 |
Qualcomm SDM845 Snapdragon 845 | 2,337 8,483 |
Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | 3,073 7,958 |
Qualcomm SM7250-AC Snapdragon 768G | 2,951 7,686 |
Qualcomm SM6350 Snapdragon 690 | 2,812 7,367 |
Qualcomm SM7250-AB Snapdragon 765G 5G | 2,578 7,053 |
Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G | 2,664 7,042 |
Apple A10 Fusion | 3,358 5,692 |
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score | |
---|---|
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 3 5G | 982 4,918 |
Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 895 5G | 1,250 4,000 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon XR2 | 924 3,416 |
Qualcomm SM8350 Snapdragon 888 5G | 1,109 3,382 |
Qualcomm SM8250-AB Snapdragon 865+ 5G | 914 3,381 |
Qualcomm SM8250-AC Snapdragon 870 5G | 965 3,260 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx Gen 2 5G | 787 3,085 |
Qualcomm SM8250 Snapdragon 865 5G | 824 3,069 |
Qualcomm SM7350-AB Snapdragon 780G 5G | 804 2,905 |
Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 4G | 784 2,852 |
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8cx | 687 2,773 |
Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G | 777 2,667 |
Qualcomm SM8150-AC Snapdragon 860 | 750 2,434 |
Qualcomm SM8325 Snapdragon 888 4G | 695 2,275 |
Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G | 660 2,001 |
Apple A10 Fusion | 722 1,354 |
Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.
Equivalence:
Smartphones with the processor Apple A10 Fusion:
When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.
We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.
Источник