Apple a10x vs a14

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A10X Fusion on one side and the Apple A14 Bionic on the other side. The first is dedicated to the tablet sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.4GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 3.1 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Specifications:

Processor	Apple A10X Fusion	Apple A14 Bionic
Market (main)	Tablet	Smartphone
ISA	ARMv8.1-A (64-bit)	ARMv8.5-A (64-bit)
Microarchitecture	Hurricane, Zephyr	Firestorm, Icestorm
Family	A series	A series
Part number(s), S-Spec	APL1071	APL1W01
Release date	Q2 2017	Q3 2020
Lithography	10 nm FinFET	5 nm
Transistors	3,300,000,000	11,800,000,000
Cores	6	6
Threads	6	6
Base frequency	1.3 GHz	1.8 GHz
Turbo frequency	2.4 GHz	3.1 GHz
Energy cores	3x Apple Zephyr @ 1.3 GHz	4x Apple Icestorm @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores	3x Apple Hurricane @ 2.38 GHz	2x Apple Firestorm @ 3.1 GHz
Cache memory	8 MB	8 MB
Max memory capacity	4 GB	6 GB
Memory types	LPDDR4	LPDDR4X DRAM
Max # of memory channels	4	4
Max memory bandwidth	51.2 GB/s	42.7 GB/s
TDP	5 W	6 W
GPU integrated graphics	Apple A10X Fusion GPU	Apple A14 Bionic GPU
GPU cores	12	4
GPU execution units	48	64
GPU shading units	384	512
GPU clock	1,000 MHz	975 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	768 GFLOPS	998.4 GFLOPS
Socket	SoC	SoC
AI accelerator	—	Neural Engine 16-core
AI computing operations per seconds	—	11 TOPS
AnTuTu	283,330	562,639
(iOS) PassMark CPU Mark	3,742	7,841
(iOS 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	3,936	6,654
(iOS 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	9,454	16,840
(iOS) Geekbench 5 single core	837	1,452
(iOS) Geekbench 5 multi-core	2,269	3,853
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	141 GFLOPS	226.8 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	1,891 pts / W	2,807 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

We see that the two processors have an equivalent number of cores, the turbo frequency of Apple A14 Bionic is bigger, that the PDT of Apple A10X Fusion is lower. The Apple A14 Bionic was started more recently.

Читайте также: Для айфона что полезного

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu — Total score
Apple A14 Bionic	562,639
Apple A10X Fusion	283,330

The difference is 99%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

iOS PassMark — CPU Mark
Apple A14 Bionic	7,841
Apple A10X Fusion	3,742

The difference in performance is 110%.

PassMark is a benchmarking software that performs several performance tests including prime numbers, integers, floating point, compression, physics, extended instructions, encoding, sorting. The higher the score is, the higher is the device capacity.

Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS 64-bit
Apple A14 Bionic	6,654 16,840
Apple A10X Fusion	3,936 9,454

In single core, the difference is 69%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 78%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS
Apple A14 Bionic	1,452 3,853
Apple A10X Fusion	837 2,269

In single core, the difference is 73%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 70%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Equivalence:

Smartphones with the processor Apple A14 Bionic:

When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

This page includes affiliate links for which the administrator of GadgetVersus may earn a commission at no extra cost to you should you make a purchase. These links are indicated using the hashtag #ad.

We do not assume any responsibility for the data displayed on our website. Please use at your own risk. Some or all of this data may be out of date or incomplete, please refer to the technical page on the respective manufacturer’s website to find the latest up-to-date information regarding the specifics of these products.

Источник

Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A14 Bionic vs Apple A10 Fusion

Apple A10X Fusion

The Apple A10X Fusion is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple that is built into the 2017 iPad Pro models. It integrates six 64 Bit cores that are divided in two clusters. Three high performance cores are clocked at up to 2.39 GHz. The three power saving cores are used for non demanding tasks. It looks like only one of both clusters is able to run at a time (therefore the apps see only three cores). The principle is similar to the first generation of ARMs big.LITTLE concept.

The performance of the SoC is positioned in the high and and clearly faster than all previous Apple SoCs. Even compared to Android high-end SoCs like the Snapdragon 835, the A10X takes the lead (e.g. in Geekbench or Antutu).

The integrated graphics card of the SoC will most likely stem from PowerVR (again) and features 12 cores instead of 6 in the A10 SoC.

According to TechInsights, the A10X is manufactured in the brand new 10 nm FinFet process at TSMC. Altough it offers more function blocks, the A10X is with measured 96.4 mm2 significantly smaller than the previous A9X (143.9 mm2).

Apple A14 Bionic

The Apple A14 Bionic is a System on a Chip (SoC) from Apple that is found in the iPhone 12 and iPad Air (2020) models. It was announced late 2020 and offers 6 cores divided in 2 performance cores (Firestorm) and four power efficiency cores (Icestorm). Apple states that the A14 offers a 40 percent higher CPU performance than the old A12 in the iPad Air 2019. That should translate to a modest gain of around 20% compared to the Apple A13. The A14 integrates a fast 4-core-GPU and a 16-core Neural Engine that is able to reach a maximum of 11 TOPS. The memory controller supports LPDDR4X and 4 or 6 GB are directly above the chip (package on package — PoP).

The chip is manufactured in 5nm and integrates 11.8 billion transistors.

Apple A10 Fusion

The Apple A10 Fusion is a system on a chip (SoC) from Apple that is built into the iPhone 7 and iPhone 7 Plus. It integrates four 64 Bit cores that are divided in two clusters. Two high performance cores are clocked at up to 2.34 GHz and should be around 40% faster than the Apple A9 (according to Apple) and two low power cores (up to 1.1 GHz?). Up to now its unclear if all four cores can be used at once (that need only 1/5 th of the energy in some use cases). At the release of the iPhone 7 it looks like that IOS is only using two cores at a time and automatically switches between the two clusters. Therefore, apps are seeing only a dual core. The principle is similar to the first generation of ARMs big.LITTLE concept.

The integrated graphics card of the SoC will most likely stem from PowerVR (again) and perform 50% faster at 2/3 of the power consumption (according to Apple).

All in all the chip includes 3.3 billion transistors, which is more than a current AMD Bristol Ridge (3.1) and Skylake Quad-Core (1.75) X86 SoCs.

Источник

Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A14 Bionic

Почему Apple A10X Fusion лучше чем Apple A14 Bionic?

8 больше исполнительных блоков GPU

Почему Apple A14 Bionic лучше чем Apple A10X Fusion?

27.98% выше скорость центрального процессора

Какие сравнения самые популярные?

Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A13 Bionic

Apple A14 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888

Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A11 Bionic

Apple A14 Bionic

Apple A13 Bionic

Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A10 Fusion

Apple A14 Bionic

Apple A15 Bionic

Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A12 Bionic

Apple A14 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A14 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 860

Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A12X Bionic

Apple A14 Bionic

Apple A12Z Bionic

Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A14 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Apple A10X Fusion

Apple A14 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus

Apple A10X Fusion

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Apple A14 Bionic

MediaTek Dimensity 1200

Apple A10X Fusion

Qualcomm Snapdragon 860

Apple A14 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus

Отзывы пользователей