Apple a12 bionic vs exynos 9611

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A12 Bionic on one side and the Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.5GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.3 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Specifications:

Processor	Apple A12 Bionic	Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611
Market (main)	Smartphone	Smartphone
ISA	ARMv8.3-A (64-bit)	ARMv8-A (64-bit)
Microarchitecture	Vortex, Tempest	Cortex-A73, Cortex-A53
Family	A series	Exynos 7
Part number(s), S-Spec	APL1W81	Exynos 7 Octa 9611, s5E9611
Release date	Q3 2018	Q3 2019
Lithography	7 nm FinFET	10 nm LPE
Transistors	6,900,000,000	—
Cores	6	8
Threads	6	8
Base frequency	1.6 GHz	1.7 GHz
Turbo frequency	2.5 GHz	2.3 GHz
Energy cores	4x Apple Tempest @ 1.59 GHz	4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.7 GHz
High performance cores	2x Apple Vortex @ 2.49 GHz	4x ARM Cortex-A73 @ 2.3 GHz
Cache memory	8 MB	2 MB
Max memory capacity	4 GB	6 GB
Memory types	LPDDR4X-2133	LPDDR4X
Max # of memory channels	4	4
Max memory bandwidth	42.7 GB/s	11.92 GB/s
TDP	6 W	8 W
GPU integrated graphics	Apple A12 Bionic GPU	ARM Mali-G72 MP3
GPU cores	4	—
GPU execution units	32	3
GPU shading units	256	48
GPU clock	1,125 MHz	850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	576 GFLOPS	86.4 GFLOPS
Socket	SoC	SoC
AI accelerator	Neural Engine 8-core	—
AI computing operations per seconds	5 TOPS	—
AnTuTu	368,880	155,300
(iOS 64-bit \| Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	4,695	1,645
(iOS 64-bit \| Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	10,985	5,303
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	134.6 GFLOPS	34.9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	1,831 pts / W	663 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Apple A12 Bionic is greater, that the PDT of Apple A12 Bionic is lower. The Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611 was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu — Total score
Apple A12 Bionic	368,880
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611	155,300

The difference is 138%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS & Android 64-bit
Apple A12 Bionic	4,695 10,985
Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9611	1,645 5,303

In single core, the difference is 185%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 107%.

Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.

Источник

Comparision Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Apple A12 Bionic

Top specs and features

Total clock frequency

Samsung Exynos 9611: 4 x 2.3 & 4 x 1.7 GHz
Apple A12 Bionic: 2 x 2.5 & 4 x 1.6 GHz

RAM speed

Samsung Exynos 9611: 2133 MHz
Apple A12 Bionic: MHz

Has built-in lte

Samsung Exynos 9611: Да
Apple A12 Bionic: Да

Semiconductor size

Samsung Exynos 9611: 10 nm
Apple A12 Bionic: 7 nm

Has integrated graphics

Samsung Exynos 9611: Да
Apple A12 Bionic: Да

Сравнительная таблица значений характеристик Мобильные процессоры среди всей выборки товаров

Характеристика	Samsung Exynos 9611	Apple A12 Bionic
Производительность	795	654
Память	358	1
Функции	874	699
Тесты в бенчмарках	13	—
Общая тактовая частота	4 x 2.3 & 4 x 1.7 GHz	2 x 2.5 & 4 x 1.6 GHz
Скорость оперативной памяти	2133 MHz	—
Имеет встроенный lte	Да	Да
Размер полупроводников	10 nm	7 nm
Имеет интегрированную графику	Да	Да
Поток выполнения процессора	8	—

Winner Samsung Exynos 9611

Total clock frequency;
RAM speed = 2133. This parameter is higher than that of 64% ;
Has built-in lte;
Semiconductor size = 10. This parameter is lower than that of 86% ;
Has integrated graphics;
Processor thread = 8. This parameter is higher than that of 52% ;
Supports 64-bit system;
Uses big.little technology;

Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Apple A12 Bionic: highlights

The RAM can be faster to increase system performance.

LTE is located on a system on a chip (SoC). Built-in LTE cellular allows downloads much faster than older 3G technologies.

The small size of the semiconductors means this is a new generation chip.

With integrated graphics, you don’t need to buy a separate card.

The more threads, the better the processor’s performance will be, and it will be able to perform multiple tasks at the same time.

A 64-bit system, as opposed to a 32-bit system, can support more than 4 GB of RAM. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.

The use of big.LITTLE technology allows the chip to switch between processors to increase performance. The battery life is also extended. For example, checking emails or browsing the web will use a less powerful processor to extend battery life, while playing games will run a more powerful processor to increase performance.

Dynamic frequency scaling is required to enable the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when operating under light load.

Источник

Apple A12 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9611

Почему Apple A12 Bionic лучше чем Samsung Exynos 9611?

Размер полупроводников 3nm меньше

Почему Samsung Exynos 9611 лучше чем Apple A12 Bionic?

40.35% выше скорость центрального процессора

Какие сравнения самые популярные?

Apple A12 Bionic

Apple A13 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 9611

MediaTek Helio G80

Apple A12 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

Samsung Exynos 9611

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Apple A12 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 9611

Samsung Exynos 850

Apple A12 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 860

Samsung Exynos 9611

Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G

Apple A12 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 9611

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G

Apple A12 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Samsung Exynos 9611

Mediatek Helio G95

Apple A12 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

Samsung Exynos 9611

Qualcomm Snapdragon 730

Apple A12 Bionic

Apple A11 Bionic

Samsung Exynos 9611

MediaTek Helio G90T

Apple A12 Bionic

Apple A10X Fusion

Samsung Exynos 9611

Qualcomm Snapdragon 712

Apple A12 Bionic

Apple A12X Bionic

Samsung Exynos 9611

MediaTek Helio G85