- Apple a7 vs snapdragon 425
- Specifications:
- Performances :
- Apple A7X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
- Почему Apple A7X лучше чем Qualcomm Snapdragon 425?
- Почему Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 лучше чем Apple A7X?
- Какие сравнения самые популярные?
- Отзывы пользователей
- Общий рейтинг
- Функции
- Комментарии
- Общая информация
- Производительность
- Память
- Apple a7 vs snapdragon 425
- Specifications:
- Performances :
Apple a7 vs snapdragon 425
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A7 on one side and the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.4GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 4 cores, 4 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Specifications:
| Processor | Apple A7 | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 |
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| ISA | ARMv8.0-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Cyclone | Cortex-A53 |
| Family | A series | Snapdragon 400 |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | S5L8960X | MSM8917 |
| Release date | Q3 2013 | Q3 2016 |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 28 nm LP |
| Transistors | 1,000,000,000 | — |
| Cores | 2 | 4 |
| Threads | 2 | 4 |
| Base frequency | 1.4 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | — | — |
| High performance cores | 2x Apple Cyclone @ 1.4 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz |
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 512 KB |
| Max memory capacity | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR3 | LPDDR3-667 |
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 12.8 GB/s | 5.34 GB/s |
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR G6430 | Qualcomm Adreno 308 |
| GPU execution units | 4 | 1 |
| GPU shading units | 64 | 24 |
| GPU base clock | 457 MHz | 500 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 600 MHz | 500 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 153.6 GFLOPS | 24 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| AnTuTu | 65,000 | 32,580 |
| (iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,210 | 648 |
| (iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 2,076 | 1,819 |
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 28 GFLOPS | 5.09 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 415 pts / W | 364 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 has a larger number of cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu — Total score | |
|---|---|
Apple A7 | 65,000 |
| Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | 32,580 |
The difference is 100%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS & Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Apple A7 | 1,210 2,076 |
| Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | 648 1,819 |
In single core, the difference is 87%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 14%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Источник
Apple A7X vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Почему Apple A7X лучше чем Qualcomm Snapdragon 425?
- 1 большее количество каналов памяти
Почему Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 лучше чем Apple A7X?
Какие сравнения самые популярные?
MediaTek Helio X30
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
MediaTek Helio P22
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
MediaTek Helio A20
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
MediaTek Helio P22
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Qualcomm Snapdragon 410
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
MediaTek Helio P35
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
MediaTek Helio A22
Qualcomm Snapdragon 425
MediaTek Helio G25
Отзывы пользователей
Общий рейтинг
Функции
Комментарии
Отзывов пока нет
Помогите нашему сообществу, поделившись своим опытом.
Общая информация
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Производительность
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Память
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A7X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Qualcomm Snapdragon 425)
Источник
Apple a7 vs snapdragon 425
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 on one side and the Apple A7 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 4 cores, 4 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.4GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.4 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Specifications:
| Processor | Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | Apple A7 |
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| ISA | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ARMv8.0-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A53 | Cyclone |
| Family | Snapdragon 400 | A series |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | MSM8917 | S5L8960X |
| Release date | Q3 2016 | Q3 2013 |
| Lithography | 28 nm LP | 28 nm |
| Transistors | — | 1,000,000,000 |
| Cores | 4 | 2 |
| Threads | 4 | 2 |
| Base frequency | 1.4 GHz | 1.4 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | — | — |
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.4 GHz | 2x Apple Cyclone @ 1.4 GHz |
| Cache memory | 512 KB | 4 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR3-667 | LPDDR3 |
| Max # of memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 5.34 GB/s | 12.8 GB/s |
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 308 | Imagination PowerVR G6430 |
| GPU execution units | 1 | 4 |
| GPU shading units | 24 | 64 |
| GPU base clock | 500 MHz | 457 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 500 MHz | 600 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 24 GFLOPS | 153.6 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| AnTuTu | 32,580 | 65,000 |
| (Android 64-bit | iOS 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 648 | 1,210 |
| (Android 64-bit | iOS 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 1,819 | 2,076 |
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 5.09 GFLOPS | 28 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 364 pts / W | 415 pts / W |
| Amazon | | |
| eBay | | |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 has more cores, they have a similar turbo frequency, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu — Total score | |
|---|---|
| Apple A7 | 65,000 |
| Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | 32,580 |
The difference is 100%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS & Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Apple A7 | 1,210 2,076 |
| Qualcomm MSM8917 Snapdragon 425 | 648 1,819 |
In single core, the difference is 87%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 14%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Источник
