- Apple a9 vs snapdragon 439
- Specifications:
- Performances :
- Apple a9 vs snapdragon 439
- Specifications:
- Performances :
- Comparision Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
- Top specs and features
- Total clock frequency
- RAM speed
- Has built-in lte
- Semiconductor size
- Has integrated graphics
- Winner Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
- Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439: highlights
Apple a9 vs snapdragon 439
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A9 on one side and the Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.9GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.0 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Specifications:
| Processor | Apple A9 | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 |
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| ISA | ARMv8.0-A (64-bit) | ARMv8-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Twister | Cortex-A53 |
| Family | A series | Snapdragon 400 |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | APL0898, APL1022 | SDM439 |
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q2 2018 |
| Lithography | 14 nm FinFET | 12 nm FinFET |
| Transistors | 2,000,000,000 | — |
| Cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base frequency | 1.9 GHz | 1.5 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | — | 2.0 GHz |
| Energy cores | — | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.45 GHz |
| High performance cores | 2x Apple Twister @ 1.85 GHz | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.95 GHz |
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 1 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 6.4 GB/s |
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR GT7600 | Qualcomm Adreno 505 |
| GPU execution units | 6 | 1 |
| GPU shading units | 192 | 96 |
| GPU base clock | — | 650 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 249.6 GFLOPS | 48.6 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| AnTuTu | 133,600 | 93,300 |
| (iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,938 | 907 |
| (iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 3,370 | 3,346 |
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 56.4 GFLOPS | 24 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 674 pts / W | 669 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu — Total score | |
|---|---|
Apple A9 | 133,600 |
| Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 | 93,300 |
The difference is 43%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS & Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Apple A9 | 1,938 3,370 |
| Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 | 907 3,346 |
In single core, the difference is 114%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 1%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Источник
Apple a9 vs snapdragon 439
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 on one side and the Apple A9 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.0GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 2 cores, 2 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 1.9 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Specifications:
| Processor | Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 | Apple A9 |
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| ISA | ARMv8-A (64-bit) | ARMv8.0-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Cortex-A53 | Twister |
| Family | Snapdragon 400 | A series |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | SDM439 | APL0898, APL1022 |
| Release date | Q2 2018 | Q3 2015 |
| Lithography | 12 nm FinFET | 14 nm FinFET |
| Transistors | — | 2,000,000,000 |
| Cores | 8 | 2 |
| Threads | 8 | 2 |
| Base frequency | 1.5 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | 2.0 GHz | — |
| Energy cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.45 GHz | — |
| High performance cores | 4x ARM Cortex-A53 @ 1.95 GHz | 2x Apple Twister @ 1.85 GHz |
| Cache memory | 1 MB | 4 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4 |
| Max # of memory channels | 1 | 2 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | Qualcomm Adreno 505 | Imagination PowerVR GT7600 |
| GPU execution units | 1 | 6 |
| GPU shading units | 96 | 192 |
| GPU base clock | 650 MHz | — |
| GPU boost clock | 650 MHz | 650 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 48.6 GFLOPS | 249.6 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| AnTuTu | 93,300 | 133,600 |
| (Android 64-bit | iOS 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 907 | 1,938 |
| (Android 64-bit | iOS 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 3,346 | 3,370 |
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 24 GFLOPS | 56.4 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 669 pts / W | 674 pts / W |
| Amazon | | |
| eBay | | |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 has more cores, the maximum frequency of Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 was designed earlier.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu — Total score | |
|---|---|
| Apple A9 | 133,600 |
| Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 | 93,300 |
The difference is 43%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS & Android 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| Apple A9 | 1,938 3,370 |
| Qualcomm SDM439 Snapdragon 439 | 907 3,346 |
In single core, the difference is 114%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 1%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Источник
Comparision Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
Top specs and features
Total clock frequency
- Apple A9: 2 x 2 GHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439: 4 x 2 & 4 x 1.45 GHz
RAM speed
- Apple A9: 1333 MHz
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439: MHz
Has built-in lte
- Apple A9: Да
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439: Да
Semiconductor size
- Apple A9: 16 nm
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439: 12 nm
Has integrated graphics
- Apple A9: Да
Qualcomm Snapdragon 439: Да
Сравнительная таблица значений характеристик Мобильные процессоры среди всей выборки товаров
| Характеристика | Apple A9 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 439 |
|---|---|---|
| Производительность | 538 | 795 |
| Память | 182 | 67 |
| Функции | 897 | 872 |
| Общая тактовая частота | 2 x 2 GHz | 4 x 2 & 4 x 1.45 GHz |
| Скорость оперативной памяти | 1333 MHz | — |
| Имеет встроенный lte | Да | Да |
| Размер полупроводников | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Имеет интегрированную графику | Да | Да |
| Поток выполнения процессора | 2 | 8 |
| Поддерживает 64-разрядную систему | Да | Да |
Winner Qualcomm Snapdragon 439
- Total clock frequency;
- Has built-in lte;
- Semiconductor size = 12. This parameter is lower than that of 81% ;
- Has integrated graphics;
- Processor thread = 8. This parameter is higher than that of 52% ;
- Supports 64-bit system;
- RAM speed = . This parameter is lower than that of 140%
- Uses big.little technology
Apple A9 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 439: highlights
The RAM can be faster to increase system performance.
LTE is located on a system on a chip (SoC). Built-in LTE cellular allows downloads much faster than older 3G technologies.
The small size of the semiconductors means this is a new generation chip.
With integrated graphics, you don’t need to buy a separate card.
The more threads, the better the processor’s performance will be, and it will be able to perform multiple tasks at the same time.
A 64-bit system, as opposed to a 32-bit system, can support more than 4 GB of RAM. This increases productivity. It also allows you to run 64-bit applications.
The use of big.LITTLE technology allows the chip to switch between processors to increase performance. The battery life is also extended. For example, checking emails or browsing the web will use a less powerful processor to extend battery life, while playing games will run a more powerful processor to increase performance.
Dynamic frequency scaling is required to enable the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when operating under light load.
Источник
