- Apple a9x vs kirin 810
- Specifications:
- Performances :
- Apple A9X vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
- Почему Apple A9X лучше чем HiSilicon Kirin 810?
- Почему HiSilicon Kirin 810 лучше чем Apple A9X?
- Какие сравнения самые популярные?
- Отзывы пользователей
- Общая информация
- Производительность
- Память
- Apple A9 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
- Почему Apple A9 лучше чем HiSilicon Kirin 810?
- Почему HiSilicon Kirin 810 лучше чем Apple A9?
- Какие сравнения самые популярные?
- Отзывы пользователей
- Общая информация
- Производительность
- Память
- Apple a9x vs kirin 810
- Specifications:
- Performances :
Apple a9x vs kirin 810
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A9X on one side and the HiSilicon Kirin 810 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the tablet sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.3GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Specifications:
| Processor | Apple A9X | HiSilicon Kirin 810 |
| Market (main) | Tablet | Smartphone |
| ISA | ARMv8.0-A (64-bit) | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Twister | Cortex-A76, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ |
| Family | A series | Kirin 800 |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | APL1021 | Kirin 810, Hi6280 |
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q2 2019 |
| Lithography | 16 nm FinFET | 7 nm FinFET |
| Transistors | 3,300,000,000 | — |
| Cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base frequency | 2.3 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | — | 2.2 GHz |
| Energy cores | — | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz |
| High performance cores | 2x Apple Twister @ 2.26 GHz | 2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz |
| Cache memory | 3 MB | 1 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 4 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Max # of memory channels | 4 | 4 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 51.2 GB/s | 31.78 GB/s |
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR GTA7850 | ARM Mali-G52 MP6 |
| GPU execution units | 12 | 6 |
| GPU shading units | 384 | 96 |
| GPU base clock | — | 820 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 650 MHz | 820 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 499.2 GFLOPS | 157.4 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| AnTuTu | 215,070 | 234,440 |
| (iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 3,121 | 2,815 |
| (iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 5,332 | 7,666 |
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 83.3 GFLOPS | 67 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 1,066 pts / W | 1,533 pts / W |
| Amazon |  | |
| eBay |  | |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor HiSilicon Kirin 810 has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Apple A9X is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The HiSilicon Kirin 810 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu — Total score | |
|---|---|
HiSilicon Kirin 810 | 234,440 |
| Apple A9X | 215,070 |
The difference is 9%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android & iOS 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| HiSilicon Kirin 810 | 2,815 7,666 |
| Apple A9X | 3,121 5,332 |
In single core, the difference is 11%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 44%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Источник
Apple A9X vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
Почему Apple A9X лучше чем HiSilicon Kirin 810?
Почему HiSilicon Kirin 810 лучше чем Apple A9X?
- 3.5x выше скорость центрального процессора
Какие сравнения самые популярные?
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Apple A12 Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
Apple A11 Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 810
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Apple A13 Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Huawei Kirin 970
HiSilicon Kirin 810
MediaTek Dimensity 700
Apple A10 Fusion
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
Apple A10X Fusion
HiSilicon Kirin 810
MediaTek Helio G80
Apple A12X Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Mediatek Helio G95
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Отзывы пользователей
Отзывов пока нет
Помогите нашему сообществу, поделившись своим опытом.
Общая информация
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Производительность
2 x 2.27GHz & 6 x 1.88GHz
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Память
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9X)
Источник
Apple A9 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
Почему Apple A9 лучше чем HiSilicon Kirin 810?
Почему HiSilicon Kirin 810 лучше чем Apple A9?
- 3.96x выше скорость центрального процессора
Какие сравнения самые популярные?
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 860
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
HiSilicon Kirin 810
HiSilicon Kirin 960
Apple A13 Bionic
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Huawei Kirin 970
HiSilicon Kirin 810
MediaTek Dimensity 700
Qualcomm Snapdragon 450
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
HiSilicon Kirin 810
MediaTek Helio G80
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Mediatek Helio G95
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
HiSilicon Kirin 810
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
Отзывы пользователей
Отзывов пока нет
Помогите нашему сообществу, поделившись своим опытом.
Общая информация
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Производительность
2 x 2.27GHz & 6 x 1.88GHz
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Память
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (Apple A9)
Неизвестно. Помогите нам, предложите стоимость. (HiSilicon Kirin 810)
Источник
Apple a9x vs kirin 810
Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A9 on one side and the HiSilicon Kirin 810 on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 2 cores, 2 threads, a maximum frequency of 1.9GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.2 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.
Specifications:
| Processor | Apple A9 | HiSilicon Kirin 810 |
| Market (main) | Smartphone | Smartphone |
| ISA | ARMv8.0-A (64-bit) | ARMv8.2-A (64-bit) |
| Microarchitecture | Twister | Cortex-A76, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ |
| Family | A series | Kirin 800 |
| Part number(s), S-Spec | APL0898, APL1022 | Kirin 810, Hi6280 |
| Release date | Q3 2015 | Q2 2019 |
| Lithography | 14 nm FinFET | 7 nm FinFET |
| Transistors | 2,000,000,000 | — |
| Cores | 2 | 8 |
| Threads | 2 | 8 |
| Base frequency | 1.9 GHz | 1.9 GHz |
| Turbo frequency | — | 2.2 GHz |
| Energy cores | — | 6x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.9 GHz |
| High performance cores | 2x Apple Twister @ 1.85 GHz | 2x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.2 GHz |
| Cache memory | 4 MB | 1 MB |
| Max memory capacity | 2 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory types | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Max # of memory channels | 2 | 4 |
| Max memory bandwidth | 25.6 GB/s | 31.78 GB/s |
| TDP | 5 W | 5 W |
| GPU integrated graphics | Imagination PowerVR GT7600 | ARM Mali-G52 MP6 |
| GPU execution units | 6 | 6 |
| GPU shading units | 192 | 96 |
| GPU base clock | — | 820 MHz |
| GPU boost clock | 650 MHz | 820 MHz |
| GPU FP32 floating point | 249.6 GFLOPS | 157.4 GFLOPS |
| Socket | SoC | SoC |
| AnTuTu | 133,600 | 234,440 |
| (iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core | 1,938 | 2,815 |
| (iOS 64-bit | Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core | 3,370 | 7,666 |
| (SGEMM) GFLOPS performance | 56.4 GFLOPS | 67 GFLOPS |
| (Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio | 674 pts / W | 1,533 pts / W |
| Amazon | | |
| eBay | | |
We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.
Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.
The processor HiSilicon Kirin 810 has a larger number of cores, the turbo frequency of HiSilicon Kirin 810 is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The HiSilicon Kirin 810 was started more recently.
Performances :
Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.
| AnTuTu — Total score | |
|---|---|
| HiSilicon Kirin 810 | 234,440 |
| Apple A9 | 133,600 |
The difference is 75%.
AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.
| Geekbench 4 — Multi-core & single core score — Android & iOS 64-bit | |
|---|---|
| HiSilicon Kirin 810 | 2,815 7,666 |
| Apple A9 | 1,938 3,370 |
In single core, the difference is 45%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 127%.
Geekbench 4 is a complete benchmark platform with several types of tests, including data compression, images, AES encryption, SQL encoding, HTML, PDF file rendering, matrix computation, Fast Fourier Transform, 3D object simulation, photo editing, memory testing. This allows us to better visualize the respective power of these devices. For each result, we took an average of 250 values on the famous benchmark software.
Источник
