Kirin 985 vs apple a13

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the Apple A13 Bionic on one side and the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 6 cores, 6 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.7GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 8 cores, 8 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.6 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Specifications:

Processor	Apple A13 Bionic	HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
Market (main)	Smartphone	Smartphone
ISA	ARMv8.4-A (64-bit)	ARMv8.2-A (64-bit)
Microarchitecture	Lightning, Thunder	Cortex-A76, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ
Family	A series	Kirin 900
Part number(s), S-Spec	APL1W85	Kirin 985 5G, Hi6290
Release date	Q3 2018	Q2 2020
Lithography	7 nm (N7 Pro)	7 nm FinFET
Transistors	8,500,000,000	—
Cores	6	8
Threads	6	8
Base frequency	1.8 GHz	1.8 GHz
Turbo frequency	2.7 GHz	2.6 GHz
Energy cores	4x Apple Thunder @ 1.8 GHz	4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.84 GHz
High performance cores	2x Apple Lightning @ 2.65 GHz	1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.58 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.40 GHz
Cache memory	8 MB	2 MB
Max memory capacity	4 GB	8 GB
Memory types	LPDDR4X	LPDDR4X-2133
Max # of memory channels	4	4
Max memory bandwidth	42.7 GB/s	34.1 GB/s
TDP	6 W	6 W
GPU integrated graphics	Apple A13 Bionic GPU	ARM Mali-G77 MP8
GPU cores	4	—
GPU execution units	32	8
GPU shading units	256	128
GPU clock	1,350 MHz	850 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	691.2 GFLOPS	711.3 GFLOPS
Socket	SoC	SoC
AI accelerator	Neural Engine 8-core	—
AI computing operations per seconds	5.5 TOPS	—
AnTuTu	456,660	386,050
(iOS 64-bit \| Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	5,432	3,236
(iOS 64-bit \| Android 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	13,554	9,634
(iOS \| Android) Geekbench 5 single core	1,331	687
(iOS \| Android) Geekbench 5 multi-core	3,364	2,538
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	154.9 GFLOPS	57.4 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	2,259 pts / W	1,606 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

Price: For technical reasons, we cannot currently display a price less than 24 hours, or a real-time price. This is why we prefer for the moment not to show a price. You should refer to the respective online stores for the latest price, as well as availability.

The processor HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has a larger number of cores, the maximum frequency of Apple A13 Bionic is greater, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G was started more recently.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu — Total score
Apple A13 Bionic	456,660
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G	386,050

The difference is 18%.

AnTuTu is one of the most popular apps in the world to evaluate and compare the power of a mobile device with the competition. It tests above all the power of calculation, the display of Web pages, the modeling of decorations in 3D, the management of the memory, the transfer of data.

Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS & Android
Apple A13 Bionic	1,331 3,364
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G	687 2,538

In single core, the difference is 94%. In multi-core, the differential gap is 33%.

Geekbench 5 is a software for measuring the performance of a computer system, for fixed devices, mobile devices, servers. This platform makes it possible to better compare the power of the CPU, the computing power and to compare it with similar or totally different systems. Geekbench 5 includes new workloads that represent work tasks and applications that we can find in reality.

Источник

Kirin 985 vs apple a13

Comparison of the technical characteristics between the processors, with the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G on one side and the Apple A13 Bionic on the other side. The first is dedicated to the smartphone sector, It has 8 cores, 8 threads, a maximum frequency of 2.6GHz. The second is used on the smartphone segment, it has a total of 6 cores, 6 threads, its turbo frequency is set to 2.7 GHz. The following table also compares the lithography, the number of transistors (if indicated), the amount of cache memory, the maximum RAM memory capacity, the type of memory accepted, the release date, the maximum number of PCIe lanes, the values obtained in Geekbench 4 and Cinebench R15.

Specifications:

Processor	HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G	Apple A13 Bionic
Market (main)	Smartphone	Smartphone
ISA	ARMv8.2-A (64-bit)	ARMv8.4-A (64-bit)
Microarchitecture	Cortex-A76, Cortex-A55, DynamIQ	Lightning, Thunder
Family	Kirin 900	A series
Part number(s), S-Spec	Kirin 985 5G, Hi6290	APL1W85
Release date	Q2 2020	Q3 2018
Lithography	7 nm FinFET	7 nm (N7 Pro)
Transistors	—	8,500,000,000
Cores	8	6
Threads	8	6
Base frequency	1.8 GHz	1.8 GHz
Turbo frequency	2.6 GHz	2.7 GHz
Energy cores	4x ARM Cortex-A55 @ 1.84 GHz	4x Apple Thunder @ 1.8 GHz
High performance cores	1x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.58 GHz 3x ARM Cortex-A76 @ 2.40 GHz	2x Apple Lightning @ 2.65 GHz
Cache memory	2 MB	8 MB
Max memory capacity	8 GB	4 GB
Memory types	LPDDR4X-2133	LPDDR4X
Max # of memory channels	4	4
Max memory bandwidth	34.1 GB/s	42.7 GB/s
TDP	6 W	6 W
GPU integrated graphics	ARM Mali-G77 MP8	Apple A13 Bionic GPU
GPU cores	—	4
GPU execution units	8	32
GPU shading units	128	256
GPU clock	850 MHz	1,350 MHz
GPU FP32 floating point	711.3 GFLOPS	691.2 GFLOPS
Socket	SoC	SoC
AI accelerator	—	Neural Engine 8-core
AI computing operations per seconds	—	5.5 TOPS
AnTuTu	386,050	456,660
(Android 64-bit \| iOS 64-bit) Geekbench 4 single core	3,236	5,432
(Android 64-bit \| iOS 64-bit) Geekbench 4 multi-core	9,634	13,554
(Android \| iOS) Geekbench 5 single core	687	1,331
(Android \| iOS) Geekbench 5 multi-core	2,538	3,364
(SGEMM) GFLOPS performance	57.4 GFLOPS	154.9 GFLOPS
(Multi-core / watt performance) Performance / watt ratio	1,606 pts / W	2,259 pts / W
Amazon
eBay

We can better compare what are the technical differences between the two processors.

The processor HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G has more cores, the turbo frequency of Apple A13 Bionic is bigger, that their respective TDP are of the same order. The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G was designed earlier.

Performances :

Performance comparison between the two processors, for this we consider the results generated on benchmark software such as Geekbench 4.

AnTuTu — Total score
Apple A13 Bionic	456,660
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G	386,050

The difference is 18%.

Geekbench 5 — Multi-core & single core score — iOS & Android
Apple A13 Bionic	1,331 3,364
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G	687 2,538

In single core, the difference is 94%. In multi-core, the difference in terms of gap is 33%.

Источник

Apple A13 Bionic vs Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Почему Apple A13 Bionic лучше чем Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G?

Почему Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G лучше чем Apple A13 Bionic?

37.12% выше скорость центрального процессора

Какие сравнения самые популярные?

Apple A13 Bionic

Apple A10X Fusion

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Huawei Kirin 970

Apple A13 Bionic

Apple A14 Bionic

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Apple A13 Bionic

Apple A12 Bionic

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

Apple A13 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 662

Apple A13 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 860

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Huawei Kirin 980

Apple A13 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 865

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 860

Apple A13 Bionic

Qualcomm Snapdragon 870

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Huawei Kirin 820 5G

Apple A13 Bionic

Apple A12Z Bionic

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

Qualcomm Snapdragon 855

Apple A13 Bionic

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

MediaTek Dimensity 800 5G

Apple A13 Bionic

Apple A11 Bionic

Huawei HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G

MediaTek Dimensity 900

Отзывы пользователей

Отзывов пока нет

Помогите нашему сообществу, поделившись своим опытом.