- The core iphone 6
- Dual-Core iPhone 6 Demolishes Octa-Core Galaxy S6 In Graphics Performance
- Обзор и тестирование Apple iPhone 6
- Оглавление
- Вступление
- реклама
- Технические характеристики
- Упаковка и комплектация
- реклама
- реклама
- реклама
- Question: Q: iPhone 6S slow and low benchmark scores.
- All replies
- Apple iPhone 6
- Apple iPhone 6 — user opinions and reviews
The core iphone 6
- Home
- Microsoft
- Windows
- Mobile
- Office
- Xbox One
- Apple
- iPhone
- iPhone Activity Center
- iPhone Apps
- iPad
- iPad Activity Center
- iPad Apps
- Mac OS X
- Apple Watch
- iPhone
- Google
- Google Services
- Android
- Reviews
- Wearables
- Web
- IoT
- Home Automation
- Developer Tools
- Deals
- More
- Apps
- Sprink
- Turn Off LCD
- Drive Icon Changer
- About Us
- Advertise
- Apps
Dual-Core iPhone 6 Demolishes Octa-Core Galaxy S6 In Graphics Performance
According to a newly published set of test results, the Galaxy S6 with its octa-core processor finds itself bullied around by the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus with their dual-core chips and 1GB of RAM when it comes to graphics performance. Don’t believe us? Head over the jump for more details.
The Galaxy S6 is no doubt the best Android smartphone to come out of the Korean camp since a while, both on the design and performance front. The camera is brilliant, and so is the super-sharp Quad-HD display giving the phone a pixel density of 577ppi. However, this overkill of a display is what seems to be dragging down the performance of the phone in graphics intensive tasks.
As AppleInsider notes after conducting a series of performance tests on the Galaxy S6, the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus are clearly ahead of the super-phone from Samsung. All graphics performance tests based on various benchmarks show the significant hit that the Galaxy S6 is taking despite the fancy spec sheet the Korean giant touts.
iPhones have always been modest in the race to the latest specs, and Android devices are usually marketed and pitched as powerful and monstrous devices with their chunky CPU and GPU cores, RAM, and Quad-HD displays, but seldom has that threatened to out-perform iPhones and iPads.
“Samsung has pushed screen technology ahead of its own processor capabilities, resulting in extremely poor performance in high definition,” and interestingly it’s not just Samsung that has taken a hit from packing in more pixels in the display; “the iPhone 6 Plus resulted in graphics that were in some cases slower at their native resolution than 2013’s iPhone 5s: rendering a challenging OpenGL ES 3.0 3D scene dropped frame rates from 24.4 to 19.2 fps.”
The conclusion of the benchmark result is a simple one; as AppleInsider notes, Samsung has made “bad engineering choices,” and has opted to push better displays over key internal hardware, such as the GPU and CPU. And since the screen is bound to push more pixels around, like we mentioned before, the Galaxy S6 falls shorts in terms of performance when compared to the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus bundled with Apple’s second-gen 64-bit A8 chip, even though the Korean giant’s new flagship comes packed with 3GB of RAM – 2.6GB user available. The real winner for Apple here is the display, which is sharp enough to give users that undistinguishable pixel experience, and at the same time, keep performance as top-notch as possible. Lastly, Apple has the killer advantage of optimizing its software according to its hardware, giving it the edge over everyone else in the industry.
iPhones and iPads have always been in a league of their own when it comes to mobile gaming, and with the recent Metal technology being deployed in iOS 8, Apple is really pushing the boundaries of mobile graphics. At the end, Apple’s decision to stick to a pixel density that is not exactly overkill will continue to pay off pretty well against the likes of the Galaxy S6 with all its bling.
What’s your take on the matter? Share with us in the comments section below.
You can follow us on Twitter, add us to your circle on Google+ or like our Facebook page to keep yourself updated on all the latest from Microsoft, Google, Apple and the web.
Источник
Обзор и тестирование Apple iPhone 6
Оглавление
Вступление
Благодаря компании First Store мы уже познакомились с новым iPhone 6, а теперь пришло время узнать о нем в деталях.
реклама
Сложно сказать, чем руководствовалась компания Apple, когда приняла решение увеличить диагональ экрана с 4 до 4.7 дюймов, но одно можно сказать точно: теперь на рынке стало еще сложнее найти достойный смартфон с небольшим дисплеем.
Остается надеяться, что компания пересмотрит свои приоритеты и выведет на рынок еще одну модель с меньшей матрицей для того, чтобы более полно охватить целевую аудиторию, ведь многие любили iPhone именно за компактные размеры.
Технические характеристики
Тип устройства | Смартфон |
Модель | Apple iPhone 6 |
Процессор | Apple A8 |
Видеопроцессор | PowerVR GX6650 |
Операционная система | iOS 8 |
Оперативная память, Гбайт | 1 |
Внутренняя память, Гбайт | 16/64/128 |
Экран | IPS 4.7″, 1334 x 750 |
Камера, Мпикс | 8, фронтальная 1.2 |
Сеть | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 |
Количество SIM-карт, шт. | 1 |
Поддержка MicroSD | Нет |
Передача данных | GPRS, Wi-Fi (b/g/n/ac), BT, 3G, LTE |
GPS/aGPS/ГЛОНАСС | Есть/Есть/Есть |
Батарея, мАч | 1810 |
Размеры, мм | 67 x 138 x 7.8 |
Масса, г | 129 |
Цена, рублей | 30000-45000 |
Судя по техническим характеристикам, никаких революционных изменений не произошло, не считая увеличившегося экрана. Емкость батареи выросла совсем незначительно, а производительности однокристальной системы Apple A8 в паре с сопроцессором M8 хватит с запасом, учитывая, что ни одно из приложений на данный момент не «тормозит» и на чипах прошлого поколения – A7. Печально, что объем ОЗУ остался нетронутым – всего 1 Гбайт, в то время когда конкурирующие решения вплотную подбираются к четырем.
Упаковка и комплектация
реклама
Упаковка стала очень неприглядной, с лицевой стороны убрали даже изображение модели.
Надпись сбоку лишилась нумерации поколения, но по ней все еще можно узнать цвет устройства.
Сзади все традиционно и привычно – огромное количество правовой информации и ни слова о технических характеристиках.
Вместо красивой картинки на лицевой стороне пользователь видит перед собой скудную выштамповку.
Сбоку присутствует лишь надпись iPhone без указания поколения.
Смартфон лежит в мягкой рамке, так что волноваться за его сохранность при перевозке не стоит, тем более что дисплей защищен транспортировочной пленкой.
Все аксессуары аккуратно сложены в пластиковой форме, ничего не «гуляет» по коробке и не издает лишних звуков.
Если у вас когда-нибудь был iPhone, то комплектация вас не удивит:
- Стереогарнитура;
- Зарядное устройство;
- Кабель Lightning.
реклама
В лучших традициях производителя все аксессуары выполнены на очень высоком уровне, познакомимся с ними поближе.
Зарядное устройство является точной копией того, что можно было встретить в предыдущих моделях.
Стереогарнитура EarPods выглядит и звучит неплохо, но далеко не всем ее удобно носить.
реклама
Пульт оснащен клавишами регулировки громкости.
Разъем Lightning не претерпел серьезных конструктивных изменений.
Источник
Question: Q: iPhone 6S slow and low benchmark scores.
After iOS 10.3 update I some lag experiences and got same benchs scores(very low) with and without lowpower mode.
Anyone with the same experience?
Already tried a clean install and the results are the same.
iPhone 6s, iOS 10.3
Posted on Apr 3, 2017 4:43 AM
My iPhone 6s issue was fixed, the main problem was indeed the battery, but did not replace the battery, the replace the phone.
Posted on Apr 16, 2017 2:15 PM
All replies
Loading page content
Page content loaded
My iPhone 6S on iOS 10.3 scored 2506 single-core and 4206 multi-core on Geekbench 4.
Apr 3, 2017 6:19 AM
How can I fixe this?
Apr 3, 2017 6:26 AM
Sorry, I cannot help you, but my iPhone 6 (not 6S) has the exact same problem. I get about half the benchmark score as I did with iOS 10.1. There is no difference when I enable low power mode. Everything seems to run and start slower. I believe the problem is caused by Apple’s battery «fix» that came in iOS 10.2.1.
How it works is that it somehow detects that I have a questionable battery, either via serial number or measurements. Then it throttles down the processor speed to avoid power spikes that would otherwise have caused drops in battery voltage. It is these voltage drops that can cause unexpected shutdowns.
So for me, iOS 10.2.1 works better in that there are less shutdowns, but I have to accept that everything now runs at about half the speed, compared to iOS 10.1. This has been confirmed via benchmarks, which now run at about 40-60% of the speed from November last year. The lower the battery, the slower the phone becomes. It can also be seen from how enabling power save mode, no longer changes the benchmark scores. The phone always runs in power saving mode (the processor speed part of power save mode). I am not sure how I feel about this solution.
What can be seen from the public benchmark database for Geekbench, is that there now seems to be two categories of iPhone 6: 1) those that run as before, 2) those that run at about half the speed. I think that those that run at half the speed are being down-throttled to prevent unexpected shutdowns. If anyone can explain these benchmark differences otherwise, please do so. I would have liked my phone to run as it used to when it was new, I can always charge it before it gets to 35% or so, when shutdowns start(ed) to occur. And yes, I have tried a clean iOS install as New Phone, and run all benchmarks with Background App Refresh off and in Airplane mode.
Apr 3, 2017 1:23 PM
Indeed. I experienced the same problems on iPhone 6 on iOS 10.3.1 even 10.3.2 beta 2. It drove me nuts. But I believe you are right. It’s logical and the shutdowns don’t occur anymore. But it leaves me with a bitter feeling that the phone isn’t at it’s peak performance anymore.
Massive drops in Antutu and Geekbench. Always changing. Lowest was — 50% perf. drop.
Even on full charge or with power connected the performance won’t go to 100%. Maybe 80% max.
And yes, it depends of the battery charge. Lower the battery — lower the scores.
My battery life is estimated to be at somewhere of 83%. Shutdowns we’re present on 10.2.
I’m seeing the performance drop using the phone too. First I thought it was the OS. Now, I know.
I understand the idea. It’s kind of an elegant solution to resolve the shutdown problem. But it bugs me.
Now my question is . If I replace the battery, would the CPU continues to throttle like this or will it be normal again ?
Источник
Apple iPhone 6
Network | Technology | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE |
---|---|---|
2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 — A1549 (GSM), A1549 (CDMA), A1586 | |
CDMA 800 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 — A1549 (CDMA), A1586 | ||
3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700 / 1900 / 2100 — A1549 (GSM), A1549 (CDMA), A1586 | |
CDMA2000 1xEV-DO — A1549 (CDMA), A1586 | ||
TD-SCDMA — A1586 | ||
4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29 — A1549 GSM, A1549 CDMA | |
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 38, 39, 40, 41 — A1586 | ||
Speed | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE-A Cat4 150/50 Mbps, EV-DO Rev.A 3.1 Mbps |
Launch | Announced | 2014, September 09. Released 2014, September 19 |
---|---|---|
Status | Discontinued |
Body | Dimensions | 138.1 x 67 x 6.9 mm (5.44 x 2.64 x 0.27 in) |
---|---|---|
Weight | 129 g (4.55 oz) | |
Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass), aluminum back, aluminum frame | |
SIM | Nano-SIM | |
Apple Pay (Visa, MasterCard, AMEX certified) |
Display | Type | IPS LCD |
---|---|---|
Size | 4.7 inches, 60.9 cm 2 ( 65.8% screen-to-body ratio) | |
Resolution | 750 x 1334 pixels, 16:9 ratio ( 326 ppi density) | |
Protection | Ion-strengthened glass, oleophobic coating |
Platform | OS | iOS 8, upgradable to iOS 12.4.6 |
---|---|---|
Chipset | Apple A8 (20 nm) | |
CPU | Dual-core 1.4 GHz Typhoon (ARM v8-based) | |
GPU | PowerVR GX6450 (quad-core graphics) |
Memory | Card slot | No |
---|---|---|
Internal | 16GB 1GB RAM, 32GB 1GB RAM, 64GB 1GB RAM, 128GB 1GB RAM |
Main Camera | Single | 8 MP, f/2.2, 29mm (standard), 1/3″, 1.5µm, PDAF |
---|---|---|
Features | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR | |
Video | 1080p@60fps, 720p@240fps |
Selfie camera | Single | 1.2 MP, f/2.2, 31mm (standard) |
---|---|---|
Features | face detection, HDR, FaceTime over Wi-Fi or Cellular | |
Video | 720p@30fps |
Sound | Loudspeaker | Yes |
---|---|---|
3.5mm jack | Yes | |
16-bit/44.1kHz audio |
Comms | WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, hotspot |
---|---|---|
Bluetooth | 4.0, A2DP, LE | |
GPS | Yes, with A-GPS, GLONASS | |
NFC | Yes (Apple Pay only) | |
Radio | No | |
USB | Lightning, USB 2.0 |
Features | Sensors | Fingerprint (front-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
---|---|---|
Siri natural language commands and dictation |
Battery | Type | Li-Po 1810 mAh, non-removable (6.9 Wh) |
---|---|---|
Stand-by | Up to 250 h (3G) | |
Talk time | Up to 14 h (3G) |
Misc | Colors | Space Gray, Silver, Gold |
---|---|---|
Models | A1549, A1586, A1589, A1522, A1524, A1593, iPhone7,2 | |
SAR | 1.18 W/kg (head) 1.18 W/kg (body) | |
SAR EU | 0.98 W/kg (head) 0.97 W/kg (body) | |
Price | About 100 EUR |
Tests | Performance | Basemark X: 15841 |
---|---|---|
Display | Contrast ratio: 1213 (nominal), 3.838 (sunlight) | |
Camera | Photo / Video | |
Loudspeaker | Voice 66dB / Noise 65dB / Ring 72dB | |
Audio quality | Noise -94dB / Crosstalk -73.4dB | |
Battery life |